Beginner's Guide to the LSAT
-By Eric Tannenbaum
Welcome! If you’re reading this guide, you’re considering, or have decided, to take the Law School Admissions Test, or the LSAT. It can be a bit overwhelming when you’re just starting out, so in this guide I’ll try to give you a rundown of the basics of what the LSAT is, how to study for it, and what you can do to maximize your score. Along the way, I’ll offer stories and advice based on what has worked for me, my students, and the many, many people I’ve talked to about this test over the years. This guide is meant to help an absolute beginner, so I won’t be getting too in-depth on any one subject. I’ll save that for other articles.
Before we start, a quick note on bias. As I’m sure you’ve noticed, I am a private LSAT tutor, which obviously means I’m going to be more favorable to certain methods or strategies for the LSAT than someone not in my position. I’ve tried to be as fair as possible when it comes to presenting these things, but as with everything on the internet, think critically and read with a grain of salt.
This guide is broken up into 4 parts. Feel free to jump around as needed:
Part 1 – What is the LSAT?
Part 2 – The Content of the LSAT
PArt 1 — What is the LSAT?
The Law School Admissions Test (commonly abbreviated to LSAT) is a standardized test that is taken by students wishing to enter Law School. It is a graduate level test, taken by those who have graduated, or are about to graduate from college. It is not required by many law schools, often other tests like the GRE are valid substitutes, but it is generally considered to be standard for Law Schools, and some schools may require it. You should always check the requirements for any schools you are considering applying to if you are uncertain if taking the LSAT is right for you.
The LSAT is administered by the Law School Admissions Council, or LSAC, and is available around 10 times a year (usually there’s a test date once a month, with some months being skipped). It can be taken online, or in person depending on the preference of the test taker. More information about the LSAT, including the dates of upcoming tests, can be found on the LSAC’s website.
Like many other standardized tests, the LSAT has several discrete sections that contain different content from one another. Unlike some tests like the GRE or SAT, the LSAT will not give you a separate score for each section. Instead, you will get a final score between 120 and 180 (No, I don’t know why those numbers are chosen, there aren’t nearly that many questions). In Part 2 of this guide, we’ll go over the content of the sections, but for now know that you’ll have to take four of these sections, though only three of them will be scored. Sections range from 25 to 28 questions each, a full LSAT usually being around 102-104 questions in total. You are given 35 minutes to complete each section and have a 10-minute break between section 2 and 3, making the test take slightly less than 2.5 hours to complete in one sitting. (These times are all assuming the default, but you can and should apply for accommodations if you need them which might change what I’ve said here).
All sections on the LSAT are multiple choice, with five answers for each question. There is no short response, or questions that can have multiple answers, every question will have one correct answer and nothing more. Not answering a question is the same as getting it wrong, so there is no harm in guessing. There is a written portion of the LSAT that is taken separately and is ungraded, which you do not need to worry about right now.
To recap; the LSAT has 4 sections, 3 are graded. Each section has 25-28 questions and has a time limit of 35 minutes. All questions are multiple choice, and you’ll receive a final score ranging from 120 to 180 depending on how many you get right.
PArt 2 — The CONTENT of the LSAT
So, what are the sections of the LSAT, and what’s on them? As of right now there are two types of sections: Reading Comprehension (RC) and Logical Reasoning (LR). Every test will have two graded LR sections and one graded RC section. There is also an ungraded “experimental” section. This is almost always an extra RC or LR section. You are not told ahead of time which section is experimental, and the order of the sections is random, so you’ll need to try your hardest on all 4 sections, even though one of them won’t count.
A quick aside – if you have older test materials or have heard about the LSAT from someone who took it in the past, you might be confused by what I just said, because you might have heard about a section called Analytical Reasoning or Logic Games. This section was removed in August of 2024, and is at the time of writing this guide not currently on the LSAT.
Let’s talk about what you’ll find in LR and RC. First, Logical Reasoning. This section will have 25 or 26 questions that are each attached to a short prompt, known as a stimulus. Each question has a different stimulus, so all questions in this section are separate from one another. Let’s look at a sample Logical Reasoning question found on the LSAC’s website:
Journalist: To reconcile the need for profits sufficient to support new drug research with the moral imperative to provide medicines to those who most need them but cannot afford them, some pharmaceutical companies feel justified in selling a drug in rich nations at one price and in poor nations at a much lower price. But this practice is unjustified. A nation with a low average income may still have a substantial middle class better able to pay for new drugs than are many of the poorer citizens of an overall wealthier nation.
Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the journalist’s reasoning?
A) People who are ill deserve more consideration than do healthy people, regardless of their relative socioeconomic positions.
B) Wealthy institutions have an obligation to expend at least some of their resources to assist those incapable of assisting themselves.
C) Whether one deserves special consideration depends on one’s needs rather than on characteristics of the society to which one belongs.
D) The people in wealthy nations should not have better access to health care than do the people in poorer nations.
E) Unequal access to health care is more unfair than an unequal distribution of wealth.
You can see how the question is formatted – a short stimulus (in this case the journalist’s argument about drug research), a question, and a list of five answer choices. This question is asking us to justify, or support, the journalist’s argument so we’ll want to pick the answer that does that. Go ahead and give it a try! Once you have your answer, go ahead and reveal the correct choice:
-
Correct Answer: C
If you’re curious as to why that was the correct answer, check out the LSAC’s explanation on their website (it’s question #6). LR is full of questions like this, which ask you to evaluate, understand, explain and modify arguments. As you study Logical Reasoning, you’ll learn about all the different question types that are found in this section, and strategies for how to solve them. Since this is just a rudimentary introduction and I don’t want to overwhelm anyone just starting out, I’ll keep things brief and move on here, but there’s a lot to learn about LR. I’ll talk more about resources to dive further into Logical Reasoning in Parts 3 and 4.
As for Reading Comprehension, this section differs from Logical Reasoning quite strongly. Rather than a set of short stimuli for each question, RC has four much longer passages that each have anywhere from 5 to 8 questions attached to them, usually totaling to 27 or 28 questions. These passages are generally several paragraphs long, and can be on basically any topic; history, philosophy, art, music, science, culture, and yes even law. Generally speaking, knowledge of the topic isn’t required to answer the questions, but passages can be dense and difficult to read. Let’s look at a sample RC passage and question, again from the LSAC website:
The painter Roy Lichtenstein helped to define pop art—the movement that incorporated commonplace objects and commercial-art techniques into paintings—by paraphrasing the style of comic books in his work. His merger of a popular genre with the forms and intentions of fine art generated a complex result: while poking fun at the pretensions of the art world, Lichtenstein’s work also managed to convey a seriousness of theme that enabled it to transcend mere parody.
That Lichtenstein’s images were fine art was at first difficult to see, because, with their word balloons and highly stylized figures, they looked like nothing more than the comic book panels from which they were copied. Standard art history holds that pop art emerged as an impersonal alternative to the histrionics of abstract expressionism, a movement in which painters conveyed their private attitudes and emotions using nonrepresentational techniques. The truth is that by the time pop art first appeared in the early 1960s, abstract expressionism had already lost much of its force. Pop art painters weren’t quarreling with the powerful early abstract expressionist work of the late 1940s but with a second generation of abstract expressionists whose work seemed airy, high-minded, and overly lyrical. Pop art paintings were full of simple black lines and large areas of primary color. Lichtenstein’s work was part of a general rebellion against the fading emotional power of abstract expressionism, rather than an aloof attempt to ignore it.
But if rebellion against previous art by means of the careful imitation of a popular genre were all that characterized Lichtenstein’s work, it would possess only the reflective power that parodies have in relation to their subjects. Beneath its cartoonish methods, his work displayed an impulse toward realism, an urge to say that what was missing from contemporary painting was the depiction of contemporary life. The stilted romances and war stories portrayed in the comic books on which he based his canvases, the stylized automobiles, hot dogs, and table lamps that appeared in his pictures, were reflections of the culture Lichtenstein inhabited. But, in contrast to some pop art, Lichtenstein’s work exuded not a jaded cynicism about consumer culture, but a kind of deliberate naiveté, intended as a response to the excess of sophistication he observed not only in the later abstract expressionists but in some other pop artists. With the comics—typically the domain of youth and innocence—as his reference point, a nostalgia fills his paintings that gives them, for all their surface bravado, an inner sweetness. His persistent use of comic-art conventions demonstrates a faith in reconciliation, not only between cartoons and fine art, but between parody and true feeling.
Which one of the following best captures the author’s attitude toward Lichtenstein’s work?
A) enthusiasm for its more rebellious aspects
B) respect for its successful parody of youth and innocence
C) pleasure in its blatant rejection of abstract expressionism
D) admiration for its subtle critique of contemporary culture
E) appreciation for its ability to incorporate both realism and naiveté
Again, feel free to check out the LSAC website (this time question 1) for a full explanation as to why that answer is correct. As you can see from our example, RC lives up to its name as a very reading-intensive passage. Questions will test your ability to understand, analyze, and process the passage you just read. Like with LR, as you begin your studying journey, you’ll learn more about the kinds of passages and questions you’ll encounter in this section. A lot of students struggle with RC due to its length and the time constraint, so it’s helpful to start practicing early, as learning to read fast while not sacrificing understanding usually takes time.
Mastering the LSAT requires improving at LR and RC. While there is a decent amount of conceptual and philosophical overlap between the two sections, they are different enough that you’ll generally need to study them separately. You may start out significantly better at one section than the other, and that’s okay! In the next section we’ll talk about how to start studying these sections, and how to figure out your strengths and weaknesses.
Oof! That was much longer than the LR stimulus. Fortunately, like I said earlier, each RC passage has many questions that refer to it. The question you see above would just be the first of a set if you were to encounter it on an actual LSAT. Ready to give the question a try?
-
Correct Answer: E
PArt 3 — How to start studying for the LSAT
You want to study for the LSAT, but you’re uncertain about where to begin? Don’t worry, I’ll try to help you through the process. A couple of points of order before we start.
1. Studying for the LSAT is a marathon, not a sprint.
I’ve worked with many students over the years, and very few people see meaningful progress on the LSAT in a day, or even a week. Often it can take many months of studying to improve your score significantly on the LSAT. I studied regularly for about 9 months to get a 180. You don’t need to make studying your full-time job, but being consistent over a long period of time is the best way to improve your score.
2. The LSAT is a skills test, not a knowledge test.
The LSAT is not a test of what you know. There’s no list of vocabulary to remember, no formulae to study, no laws or statutes to memorize. This is a test that, at least in theory, only tests your logical ability and careful reading. Because of this, everyone is going to have a different journey improving at the LSAT. What worked for me might not work for you, and that’s okay. As you dive into the world of the LSAT, you will see contradictory advice, strategies that conflict with one another, and ringing endorsements for resources you found dreadful. This is a feature, not a bug. Because the LSAT is about your own ability, who you are and how you learn is going to make a big difference on what methods and resources you find helpful. Even this guide should not be thought of as an absolute law, instead just a piece of friendly advice you can choose to listen to or ignore.
Alright, with those out of the way, let’s get started. What’s the first thing you should do when studying for the LSAT? If you ask me, it’s taking what we call a Diagnostic Test. As LSAT students, we’re very fortunate in that there is a plethora of previous LSATs that are available for us online for relatively cheap. These previous tests, usually referred to as Practice Tests or PTs are the best way to start, and you’ll want to take one, the diagnostic, before you do anything else to study for the LSAT. That means sitting down, and taking a full LSAT practice test, timed and everything, and seeing what score you get. There are several PTs available for free online through the LSAC and other sources.
I can already feel the objections coming, taking a practice test before you even start to study for the LSAT seems like it would be at best a waste of time and at worst a bit soul-crushing. I get it, I didn’t do good on my diagnostic, and it didn’t feel great. But there are three important reasons you’ll want to take it.
First, it gives you a sense of where your natural talent is. This can matter for determining your study schedule, your goals, how long you expect to study for, etc. If your goal is a 155 and your diagnostic was a 150, you probably don’t have to study for nearly as long as someone who aims to get a 170 with a diagnostic of a 145. You can also figure out which sections you’re better or worse at with a diagnostic, which can help guide at least the early part of studying.
Second, it helps you hold your resources accountable. Let’s say you don’t take a diagnostic and hire a tutor to help you study or pay for a course to follow along with. After a month of working with them, you take a PT and score a 153. What does that mean? Is that a good result? Did you improve? Did you stagnate? Without a baseline taken before you start studying, you’ll have no idea how helpful these resources have been. If you had taken a diagnostic in this situation and gotten a 142, you would have noticed that 11-point increase and known that your chosen resource is helping you.
Third is preparation. Practice tests don’t just help you with the content of the LSAT, they also help you with the experience of sitting down and taking a test this long and this hard, which depending on where you are in life, you may not have done for a while. This is why you absolutely must take the diagnostic in a proper testing condition. (No extra breaks, sections timed, and no looking at your score before the end!) It’s important to know what you’re up against and decide if you’re ready and willing to take potentially another dozen-or-so of these PTs over your studying journey, and a real LSAT at the end of it. I know that sounds a bit mean or jaded, but I think facing the reality of what the LSAT is head on and not shying away from it gives you the best odds of sticking it out for the long haul. The diagnostic is going to suck, yes. But as you learn and grow and improve each subsequent PT is going to suck less and less, and that’s going to help keep you going as things progress.
Okay, you’ve taken the diagnostic and gotten a score. Now what? Well, the next step is to pick your resources and get studying. In the next part I’ll do a thorough dive of the main three study paths people can take, but here are some basic pieces of advice that apply no matter how you go about studying.
Consistency is king. I mentioned this earlier, but the LSAT is all about putting in regular work. You don’t need to study every day (I didn’t), but a regular study schedule you stick to will take you a lot farther than just studying whenever you feel like it.
Track your progress. I recommend all my students to keep track of their wrong answers as they go, so they can evaluate how they’re doing. Depending on what sites and resources you are studying with, this may be done automatically, or you can keep a wrong answer journal, like this one here.
Take regular PTs. Practice tests are the best way to prepare for your test, and they give you the most accurate evaluation of your current score. A PT let’s you know how you would do if you took the LSAT today, and that’s something you’ll want to know. Tracking your score over time will help you adjust your study methods, and help you prepare for the rigor of taking the LSAT. I recommend taking one every other week to start, and then transitioning to one a week (if you can) by the time you get a month or two away from your LSAT test date.
Pull from multiple sources. Uncle Iroh once said: “It is important to draw wisdom from many different places. If you take it from only one place, it becomes rigid and stale.” I couldn’t agree more. Don’t just rely on one book, one site, one article. The wonderful thing about the LSAT is there is a glut of content available out there. I improved the best when I mixed and matched the things I liked from a dozen different books, articles, video series etc. You don’t need to be married to one source, even if it is helping you, and especially if its not.
Set “mini goals” for yourself. It’s important to have a goal score in mind. But if all you have is a start point, an end point, and a couple months in between, it can start to feel demoralizing when you don’t make it there right away. I recommend setting smaller, easier goals to achieve for yourself, rather than focusing on your end point. If you’re struggling to finish more than 2 of your RC passages in time, focus on just getting to 3 in time first before you worry about scoring a 25 out of 27. Try to make these goals measurable, so you can tell if you’ve achieved them. (‘I want to be able to get 8 out of the first 10 LR questions right’, instead of ‘I want to get better at Flaw Questions’)
Evaluate yourself regularly. Studying is great, but reviewing is just as important. Go back to old questions, check your wrong answer journal, redo old sections, rewatch old tutoring, reread articles you’ve done. Prove to yourself you have understood and mastered the content and the lessons you’ve learned. It’s easy to hear something once, go ‘oh I get that’ and then immediately forget it tomorrow. Repetition will help it sink into your brain, and you’d be amazed how quickly you can lose something if you don’t practice it.
Be flexible. As I said at the beginning, this test is different for everyone. Some people go up 10 points in a month. Others take 6 months to see similar progress. Have patience, and be willing to adjust your timeline, goals, methods, schedule and resources as needed. Don’t stick blindly to a schedule you made 4 months ago – be adaptive and be honest with yourself.
Remember, studying for the LSAT is hard! Don’t give up hope if you struggle, we’ve all been there. I’ve plateaued at the same score for months before breaking through, and I’ve worked with people who took a long time and a lot of effort to overcome their challenges. If you study regularly, practice good habits and techniques, and are diligent in your review, you will improve.
I’ll finish up with a list of resources I and many of my students have found helpful in getting started for the LSAT. I am not partnered, sponsored, or friends with any of the people/companies on this list, I just like them. It’s by no means exhaustive, but these resources are generally beginner friendly and have a solid track record.
Books: The LSAT Trainer, Powerscore Bibles, The Loophole in Logical Reasoning
Videos: LSAT Lab, Insight LSAT
Courses: Khan Academy, 7Sage
PArt 4 — Self Study vs. courses vs. private tutors
While there are uncountably many ways to study for the LSAT, most methods fall into one of three camps. First you have Self-Study, which as the name suggests involves studying by yourself at your own pace. That’s not to say you don’t use any resources – most who self-study will read books, watch videos, browse forums, etc. Then you have Courses, either in-person classes or online courses you can follow along. Some are self-paced; others are scheduled or live. Finally, you have Private Tutors (of which I am one, hello!), who are individuals you work with, usually 1-on-1 to help you study for the LSAT. In this section I’ll try to talk about the pros and cons of each method and give some advice about how to pick resources that are right for you. As I said in the beginning of this guide, I am a tutor, so please bear in mind that I will have some biases and personal opinions that color this section more than others. Take my opinions with that in mind. Finally, there is no need to only choose one of these methods, you can and often should mix and match some or all of them to meet your needs.
Self-Studying
First let’s talk about self-studying. The advantages of this are obvious, it’s completely self-paced and much less expensive than the other methods. Many self-studiers get by with just the Practice Tests (an absolute must!), one or two books, and freely available resources online. I was able to self-study on a teacher’s budget while living in NYC, so that should give you an idea of how cheap it can be. It’s also nice to not have to worry about warping your schedule to attend a class or meet a tutor, especially if you’re busy with work or school. One of the reasons I mainly self-studied when I was starting out was time, working long hours at my school didn’t give me a lot of flexibility, and it was much easier to just study an hour or two at my desk whenever I had the chance, rather than try to schedule with a tutor.
Also, despite the name I’ve chosen for this style, you don’t have to study completely alone. Study/Accountability buddies, group meetings with other students, or talking to people on forums are all ways you can still pull in outside perspectives despite not paying for classes or tutors. Obviously, these perspectives will come from fellow students and not professional tutors or educators, so they may not always be the best, but if you’ve got a good head, you can usually sort the bad advice from the good.
The upsides of self-studying are pretty obvious, but so too are the downsides. For starters, without any outside structure or accountability, it’s easy to fall out of studying, or to go too hard and burn out. Study buddies or groups can help with this, but most people find a structured course or regular tutoring meetings to be beneficial in keeping them on track, especially if they struggle with self-discipline. Similarly, a lack of structure can also lead to bad study habits, like irregular or inconsistent practice. Many students who rely only on self-studying usually pick up a couple of bad practices. This might not be a big deal, but I’ve met a few students who have been doing things wrong for months without realizing.
Which leads me to what I think the biggest issue with self-studying is. You don’t know what you don’t know. Without an outside aide or someone looking at your work, you might not realize what mistakes or bad habits you possess. It’s tough to correct something if you don’t know what to correct and having feedback of some kind goes a long way for that. Here’s an analogy: let’s say you decide to go to the gym all by yourself. You never go with anyone else who has significant gym experience, and during this time you pick up bad form while lifting. The form is hampering your progress and increasing your chance of injury. Since you’re not an expert, you don’t even realize your form is bad, let alone how to fix it, and you continue to lift with that form, reinforcing it every time you go to the gym. If someone with experience and expertise was there to see what you were doing, they could tell you what’s going wrong and how to fix it. The same is true for the LSAT. A lot of students have bad habits or make fundamental mistakes without realizing. Having someone watch what you’re doing and give you feedback is very valuable, and you shouldn’t underestimate it.
Courses
Moving on, we have our second method of structured courses. As I said earlier, there’s a spectrum of different classes that are offered. In general, courses will either be live, such as an in-person or online course that meets certain days of the week, or on-demand, like a curriculum you go through at your own pace. I’ll focus more on live courses, since on-demand courses share a lot of strengths and weaknesses with self-studying, and I’m trying not to repeat myself too much here.
Live courses/classes are usually done in group settings and involve an instructor teaching the class through a mostly set curriculum. In short, it’s class – we’ve all been through a lot of that in grade school and college. Courses have a lot of benefits, and the first one we’ll talk about is value. Compared to private tutors, most courses give you a lot of time and content for your dollar. While obviously more expensive than studying on your own, even the most well-regarded courses can be affordable for people on a modest budget. One mark against courses on this front is that many of them do require you to pay most/all of the cost up-front before you know whether you like the course, so do your research before you make a selection.
Another advantage of these courses is that, since many of them are run by larger companies, they tend to have a wealth of resources they can give to their students. From flashcards to study guides to practice sets, these courses can provide a lot of resources a private tutor might not have access to. These resources will also usually be well-integrated into the course schedule, allowing you to practice ideas and concepts on your own when they come up in class.
Finally, courses tend to be very thoroughly vetted. Since they can accommodate a lot of students at once, any given course will have had many more students pass through it than a tutor, giving you more feedback from people when making a decision about who you might go with.
So that’s a lot of upsides for the courses, but what are the downsides? Well as we’ve already discussed, the price and rigidity of the courses is certainly less than you’d get studying on your own. This rigidity can be especially tough for students who have busier lives. Most of us have struggles that keep us from devoting as much time as possible to the LSAT, from a job to children to school, following a course that moves at a set pace isn’t always viable if something else is dominating your time. This can lead to issues where students can burn out of courses halfway through, which is especially tough on the wallet if you must pay for the class upfront.
I think the other main drawback with classes would be something obvious – they aren’t personalized. Not every lesson is going to be helpful to you, as each student has their own areas of strength and weakness. If you need a follow-up lesson on a previously covered topic, you’ll probably not be able to get that. Similarly, you might find whole lessons devoted to areas of the LSAT you’ve already mastered. The nature of these classes being “one-size fits all” can be tough, especially if you fall outside of the average middle-ground score range. I know some companies offer classes more designed for beginners or experts, but these can be rare and hard and may still not be tailored to your own individual needs. And while you can ask instructors questions during classes, the larger class sizes limit how often you can do this.
Tutors
Finally let’s talk about hiring a private tutor. There are many tutors who have a wealth of experience on the LSAT, and each one brings their own style and method to the table. This gives you a lot of options when selecting a tutor, which is both a positive and a negative. More options means more freedom, but that can be paralyzing. Outside of this freedom of choice, I think the main benefit a tutor brings is individualization.
A tutor shines when they can work one-on-one with a client, understanding their own unique needs and goals, and helping them work on a tutoring plan that meets their needs. Ideally a tutor ensures that your time is spent highly effectively, no wasted lessons and no moving ahead too quickly. They can spend a lot more time focusing on you, and that has a lot of obvious benefits. This closer attention also makes tutors a lot more likely to notice any mistakes you might be making. If I’m teaching 30 students at once, I may not see when one makes the same error three times in a row, but as a private tutor I’ll notice that a lot more often.
Another small benefit I see to hiring a private tutor is having a resource you can lean on for advice around the test. I can say from personal experience that I talk to a lot of my clients about all aspects of taking the LSAT and applying to law school. I help them with essays, advise them on which schools to apply for, help them navigate getting accommodations and give my opinion on when I think they’re ready to take the LSAT. And I know for a fact that I’m not special or unique for this – most good tutors will do the same for their clients. That kind of access to someone who has been where you are now can be very beneficial, even just as a sounding board for your ideas.
So, what are the drawbacks of hiring a tutor? Well to start, the price is the obvious one. Tutors are expensive, good tutors doubly so. Having only a few clients at a time forces someone doing this as a full-time job to charge high rates. Now some tutors offer packages, or let you pay as you go, which can mitigate this somewhat, but I’m under no delusions that the service I offer is affordable to everyone. I make the conscientious choice to keep my client list low so I can focus on my students, and that ends up making my service quite pricey.
The other big drawback is a lack of accountability and organization. I’ve read a lot of horror stories on reddit or other forums about bad/unresponsive tutors. And here my dear reader, is where I admit that while I don’t think I’ve ever been that bad, I have slipped and missed an email or text message in the past, and at least once I’ve blanked and forgot a session. Now I’ve always tried to take proper recourse for this, but that’s not true of anyone. With a large company, you might be able to quickly get a refund, a makeup, or whatever you need. There’s not always an easy way to deal with these matters when the person you are working with is just a person.
A good tutor whose personality and style of teaching meshes well with your needs is an incredible resource, but sometimes a tutor might just not be what you need. The same is true of any given class, book, app, video series, etc. Being a good LSAT decision means making informed decisions and also understanding when what you have isn’t working for you. I encourage you to choose the resources you think will be helpful, but don’t be afraid to reach out to a different tutor, sign up for a different course, buy a different book if you have to. It’s a long road, there’s no need to suffer through it with someone/something that isn’t what you want or need.
Conclusion
Congratulations on making it this far. Hopefully you are now ready to start studying for the LSAT! Check out our other articles for more information and advice about studying for and taking the LSAT. And if you want to hire me as your personal tutor, feel free to schedule a free consultation here. (Sorry, got to get at least one shameless self-promotion in there)